<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Need to Know&#8217; or &#8216;Nice to Know&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/</link>
	<description>a journal of one Christ-following digerati wannabe.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Helmkamp</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Helmkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>Ha ha!  It depends on the boss.....if it was my current boss Brett, I would know he meant agape love, not eros.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha!  It depends on the boss&#8230;..if it was my current boss Brett, I would know he meant agape love, not eros.  <img src='http://nathandiehl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Oh...yeah, gotcha.
I was also talking in a professional sense. :)

If your boss said, 'Todd, I am going to get a doughnut. I'll bring you back one. I love you.'

It would be pretty odd...
a personal relationship is much, much different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;yeah, gotcha.<br />
I was also talking in a professional sense. <img src='http://nathandiehl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If your boss said, &#8216;Todd, I am going to get a doughnut. I&#8217;ll bring you back one. I love you.&#8217;</p>
<p>It would be pretty odd&#8230;<br />
a personal relationship is much, much different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Helmkamp</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Helmkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>But sometimes, the "fluff" is what makes communication worthwhile.  For example, my wife may say to me "I am going to the grocery store."  That's short, sweet, and to the point.  However, if she added the fluff "I love you" to the end of it, it means a lot more to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But sometimes, the &#8220;fluff&#8221; is what makes communication worthwhile.  For example, my wife may say to me &#8220;I am going to the grocery store.&#8221;  That&#8217;s short, sweet, and to the point.  However, if she added the fluff &#8220;I love you&#8221; to the end of it, it means a lot more to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is my point.
I am sorry if i seemed to mean cutting the fluff = good communication.
What i meant was cutting the fluff = better effectiveness in your communication.

it's just one step in the multi-faceted process of communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is my point.<br />
I am sorry if i seemed to mean cutting the fluff = good communication.<br />
What i meant was cutting the fluff = better effectiveness in your communication.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s just one step in the multi-faceted process of communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Helmkamp</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Helmkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/06/07/need-to-know-or-nice-to-know/#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>Good points, but I would mention that communication is more than just disseminating information, its a relational process.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, but I would mention that communication is more than just disseminating information, its a relational process.  <img src='http://nathandiehl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
