<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: clear and concise.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathandiehl.com/2007/04/17/clear-and-concise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/04/17/clear-and-concise/</link>
	<description>a journal of one Christ-following digerati wannabe.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dustin the asian</title>
		<link>http://nathandiehl.com/2007/04/17/clear-and-concise/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin the asian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/04/17/clear-and-concise/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>i guess it would, but who is the audience for this site? are they people who would understand it the same both ways? perhaps, if they are more intellectual, they would appreciate the complications of the first way more just because its complicated. if the audience is just whoever, though, i totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess it would, but who is the audience for this site? are they people who would understand it the same both ways? perhaps, if they are more intellectual, they would appreciate the complications of the first way more just because its complicated. if the audience is just whoever, though, i totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
