Comments on: what is a troll? http://nathandiehl.com/2007/03/22/what-is-a-troll/ a journal of one Christ-following digerati wannabe. Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:50:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: nathan http://nathandiehl.com/2007/03/22/what-is-a-troll/#comment-439 nathan Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:55:19 +0000 http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/03/22/what-is-a-troll/#comment-439 ryan, you should be blogging, you know. good to hear from you man. drink more coffee, btw. ryan,
you should be blogging, you know.
good to hear from you man.

drink more coffee, btw.

]]> By: Ryan Middleton http://nathandiehl.com/2007/03/22/what-is-a-troll/#comment-433 Ryan Middleton Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:45:00 +0000 http://www.nathandiehl.com/2007/03/22/what-is-a-troll/#comment-433 I must comment on the ever-so-popular page that Nathan Diehl has brewed up (pun-intended). I cannot say how I jumped on the bandwagon that is blog writing, and especially onto the specific page of Nathan. I have, once again, confused myself on how I got somewhere but in this instance I shall comment and leave a waft of sweet aroma for all to enjoy (again, pun-intended). The problem I have with troll's are that they remind me too much of leprachaun's. I cannot differentiate between the two. I know, I know this is not what Nathan was talking about, but to some degree it is - stay with me and you will see where I am going. A troll is someone who disrupts a community, in simple terms, and according to the internet-world the troll is paired with a friend and his name is stupid. Stupid and troll go together disrupting great bloggers and their quest to provide interesting conversations for all to ponder and comment on (i.e. me). Now, as I stated earlier, a troll and a leprechaun do the same thing in going around to disrupt communities. Nobody enjoys having these two around. Nor does anyone enjoy having stupid around. Get my drift? Let me clarify. You are "stupid" if you "troll" a blogger. I did just as Nathan asked, I commented. A note explaining, illustrating, or criticizing the meaning of a writing is the definition. I only add that for those thinking my presentation on troll in abstract and troll in character was a bit lengthy. I leave you with great intentions of revisiting in hopes to clarify, share, or provide insight to the filtered (pun)blog column that Great-Nate (sounds like grape-ape) has provided. Good Riddance - Ryan Middleton I must comment on the ever-so-popular page that Nathan Diehl has brewed up (pun-intended). I cannot say how I jumped on the bandwagon that is blog writing, and especially onto the specific page of Nathan. I have, once again, confused myself on how I got somewhere but in this instance I shall comment and leave a waft of sweet aroma for all to enjoy (again, pun-intended).

The problem I have with troll’s are that they remind me too much of leprachaun’s. I cannot differentiate between the two. I know, I know this is not what Nathan was talking about, but to some degree it is - stay with me and you will see where I am going. A troll is someone who disrupts a community, in simple terms, and according to the internet-world the troll is paired with a friend and his name is stupid. Stupid and troll go together disrupting great bloggers and their quest to provide interesting conversations for all to ponder and comment on (i.e. me).
Now, as I stated earlier, a troll and a leprechaun do the same thing in going around to disrupt communities. Nobody enjoys having these two around. Nor does anyone enjoy having stupid around. Get my drift? Let me clarify. You are “stupid” if you “troll” a blogger.
I did just as Nathan asked, I commented. A note explaining, illustrating, or criticizing the meaning of a writing is the definition. I only add that for those thinking my presentation on troll in abstract and troll in character was a bit lengthy.
I leave you with great intentions of revisiting in hopes to clarify, share, or provide insight to the filtered (pun)blog column that Great-Nate (sounds like grape-ape) has provided.

Good Riddance - Ryan Middleton

]]>